Red Herring Fallacy
Also known as: Misdirection, Smoke Screen
What is Red Herring?
A red herring fallacy occurs when someone introduces an irrelevant topic or issue into a discussion to divert attention away from the original argument. The new topic may be interesting or emotionally compelling on its own, but it has no logical connection to the matter being debated. The effect is that the original argument is abandoned without being properly addressed.
Example
A journalist asks a politician about their voting record on healthcare reform.
“What we really should be talking about is our incredible job growth numbers this quarter. The economy is booming!”
The politician's response, while potentially true, has nothing to do with the question about healthcare voting. The economic achievement is introduced to redirect the conversation and avoid addressing the actual question.
How to Spot It
- The response changes the subject without addressing the original point.
- A new topic is introduced that sounds relevant but does not logically connect to the issue at hand.
- The original question or argument is left unanswered after the response.
- Emotionally charged or attention-grabbing diversions are used to shift focus.
How to Counter It
- Acknowledge the new point briefly, then redirect back to the original question.
- Explicitly note that the original argument has not been addressed.
- Ask directly: 'That's a separate issue — can we return to the original question?'
- Keep a clear record of the original point being discussed to prevent drift.
Related Fallacies
Check your arguments for logical fallacies
Try the Fallacy Checker